Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slacker711 who wrote (145278)	10/2/2006 9:48:21 AM
From: Jim Mullens	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Slacker, re: BRCM v QCOM- “It has zero impact” Re : In other words, could this potential loss set up a HUGE win for the Q against NOK (BRCM /others) for GSM infringement? Hmmm, that pretty emphatic !! / thanks for the rapid response. Please elucidate. To my understanding the Q has stated and NOK has virtually admitted that GPRS/EDGE handsets include the Q’s essential IPR and that NOK does not have a license (willful infringing) for such. If the BRCM action could “shut down Q's shipments of WCDMA and DO handsets”, how is there “zero impact” that that precedent could not be applied to NOK’s infringement WRT the Q’s essential GPRS/EDGE IPR??