Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rkral who wrote (145319)	10/2/2006 12:39:19 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

I think the meeting of principal's was ordered by a judge in a California District Court ... and the staff lawyer's recommendation was made to an administrative law judge (ALJ) of the ITC. That's my understanding, too, except I would add that the ALJ saw the issues as being more complex than his staff attorney did and extended the time for the decision from August to October so that he could consider additional arguments. He did not adopt his staff attorney's position, contrary to the assertions made here that this takes place in an almost automatic manner.