Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (204970)	10/2/2006 9:21:21 PM
From: Ichy Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

But so far we have no allegations that Foley had sex with anyone. Studds had sex with a 17 year old boy, and the boy told the congress and the press to mind their own business. If the boy was above the age of consent, then Foley is guilty of what exactly???? indecent emails. How does that stack up against Studds admitting to sleeping with an intern. OTOH perhaps we need to know the democratic position on age of consent.

To: geode00 who wrote (204970)	10/2/2006 10:36:19 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Get a grip Geode. Stop abusing "children" you pervert. A 17 year old is not a child. Perverting the use of the English language is fraudulent, dishonest and destructive. You seem to have a bit of a fetish about children. Can't you leave them alone and deal with the subject, which was a 17 year old young adult. A randy homosexual 17 year old voluntarily playing games with an old geezer poofter is not a victim in the same way as people jumping to their deaths from the top of the Twin Towers to escape an even more painful death in heat. To compare the two is an insult to the people who truly suffered horrors. Mqurice