Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (12674)	10/3/2006 9:48:39 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

I am fascinated to see the same people who say that we must accept deviant behavior being legalized by democrats in Massachusetts expressing hypocritical criticism of the same behaviors because their target is a high profile Republican. My personal position on Foley is that he should have resigned. Conveniently that is consistent with my opinion of Clinton when he actually had sex with that girl and perjured himself. It will be interesting to learn just how much of a political hit this was. The Vast Leftwing Conspiracy raised its ugly head.

To: RMF who wrote (12674)	10/3/2006 10:19:18 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Respond to of 71588

Foley and His Friends October 3, 2006 9:42 AM By The Editors Initial reports created a mistaken impression of the actions of House Republican leaders toward Mark Foley. They seemed to have learned that Foley had engaged in sexual conversations with minors — pages and former pages for the House — and then done nothing about it. The truth, as it has emerged, looks slightly better: They had some reason to suspect that Foley was misbehaving with minors, but then did not do much to find out. It appears that they committed serious sins of omission rather than engaged in a cover-up. In the fall of 2005, a page for Republican congressman Rodney Alexander reported that Foley had been taking an inappropriate interest in him. Three congressmen oversee the page program; only one of them, Republican John Shimkus, was informed about the allegation. The Democrat, Dale Kildee, was kept out of the loop. In the spring, Alexander told Tom Reynolds, the head of the House Republicans’ campaign committee, about the matter. These moves make it sound as though political damage control, not the protection of the pages, was uppermost on some Republicans’ minds. Shimkus took Foley’s word for it that he was merely trying to serve as a “mentor” for the boy. Speaker Dennis Hastert’s office, which learned about the overly friendly emails from Alexander, did not press for anything more to be done. Had a more thorough investigation been conducted, the Republicans would surely have found that Foley had been sending far more explicit instant messages to other minors. The Speaker’s office explains its conduct as a result of its “sensitivity to the parents’ wishes to protect their child’s privacy.” The complaining page’s family wanted only an end to the contact. But this isn’t a good excuse. Once the suspicion had been raised, Republicans owed it to all of the pages, and their families, to follow it where it led. For that matter, is it really plausible that Foley had, in his long career, not done anything else to make his colleagues suspicious? The electronic trail does not exactly suggest that he has been discreet. Several pages have told reporters that in their circle, Foley’s proclivities were discussed. (Perhaps congressional investigators should have interviewed them earlier.) If it turns out that congressmen had heard or observed anything about Foley’s sexual interest in young men, the failure to perform a serious investigation months ago will be even harder to defend. It may also turn out that Democrats have something to answer for. If they knew that Foley was a danger to minors and withheld the information until it could be deployed for maximum political effect, then they failed in precisely the same moral duty to the pages and their families that the Republicans seem to have failed in. Rep. Foley resigned his office when the story broke. Republican conduct since then has fallen rather short of a moral reckoning. Hastert, Reynolds, and Majority Leader John Boehner contradicted one another about who knew what when, with Hastert and Boehner amending their stories with “don’t recalls.” Tony Snow, the White House spokesman, blew off the issue: “There have been other scandals, as you know, that have been more than simply naughty emails.” To Snow’s credit, he later acknowledged that he should not have minimized the offense. Now Hastert is calling for the Justice Department to investigate Foley. An investigation is overdue. It should focus on Foley, but also on those whose passivity may have enabled him. From: Bill of 51854 This summarizes where we are today nicely. article.nationalreview.com