Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (305375)	10/4/2006 10:31:56 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575784

"So no sex, and only a former page." There was more than one page. He often took pages out to lunch and dinner and at least once invited one over to his place for drinks. I wouldn't get too attached to the 'no sex'.

To: Joe NYC who wrote (305375)	10/5/2006 3:33:28 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1575784

Hmm... Yet 23 years ago, in 1983, the House administered a lesser punishment–censure–when Republican Dan Crane and Democrat Gerry Studds admitted to having had sex with two pages, Crane with a 17-year-old girl and Studds with a 17-year-old boy. So the standard seems to be that having sex with a serving page, for whom Congress has custodial responsibility, merits censure. But sending dirty IMs to a former page, for whom Congress no longer has custodial responsibility, merits the much harsher penalty of expulsion. It is getting curiouser and curiouser. So no sex, and only a former page. Has anything been going on between Foley and current page? You need to get your details on Foley's follies in order.....so far you are trying to spin like rove but its only making you look like a hastert.