Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (305399)	10/5/2006 12:39:15 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575426

combjelly, Umm, ok. Fordham thought it was important enough to contact Hastert's office. Why not address that issue? Sure there was smoke, if he did. But what exactly did he have? What exactly did he present?' "This guy Foley is acting a little strange" "Strange? In what way" "He is very friendly with former pages" "So?" "Kind of strange, pays a lot of attention to them" "So what exactly did he do?" "I don't know what he did, he is just contacting them" "Come back when you have something concrete" "Ok" I am guessing here, what might have happened. For anyone, any employer, for example, to take action, you need a very concrete fact or a concrete accusation of a person willing to stand behind the accusation. You can't go on inuendo, especially about a (closet) homosexual. Homosexuals seem to be acquiring an untouchable status because everything these days is discrimination or homophobia. I am really curious what it was that Fordham presented. Joe