SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (212691)10/5/2006 1:45:04 PM
From: j3pflynnRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
And I believe that I, at least, discounted the argument about quad-core semantics. Otellini had one part right - people don't care whether it's 2 dies or 1 on the substrate when they buy the chip. BUT - they do care if there's a functional difference, and before too long that will be demonstrated.



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (212691)10/5/2006 2:39:52 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
re: "liar"

Looks like you got a free pass here:
Message 22646140

To: AK2004 who wrote (206242) 7/21/2006 5:53:53 PM
From: ephud 206280 of 212698

<quoting the always-gracious AK2004>: if you feel like it. I even promise that I am going to support you with my vote

Let it stand then. You had an opportunity to support your claim and you refused to do so.

A liar you are.

So who lied about Rink's enforcement?

BTW, there were 19 hits on the word liar in 2006 prior to today.

Petz



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (212691)10/5/2006 4:32:36 PM
From: crazyoldmanRespond to of 275872
 
ephud OT,

Since you are so often offended on this board, feel free to stop posting.

CrazyMan


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News