Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (6631)	10/6/2006 5:52:31 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224720

This is an interesting tug of war between the Democrat propagandists and Drudge/Limbaugh. The latter have uncovered evidence this Foley flareup was a prank-gone-wild by former congressional pages when Democrat operatives intercepted some of their email messages. Have you seen this from Drudge? Wolf Blitzer today asked the page's lawyer re the prank rumors: >>CNN: THE PAGE'S LAWYER DOES NOT RULE 'IN OR OUT' PRANK CLAIM... DEVELOPING... Former congressional page Jordan Edmund's lawyer Stephen Jones... BLITZER: He will join us live in the next hour. What are you hearing, Brian, about some of these Internet suggestions, some Republicans suggesting this whole thing is a prank, a hoax and there is no there, there. CNN REPORTER: "We asked him about that item in the DRUDGE REPORT. He said very clearly he cannot rule that in, he cannot rule that out. He says he is not saying it was not a prank but later in the interview, CNN pressed him on that. He said that he -- he does not read the DRUDGE REPORT, not part of his regular reading and, quote, it sounds like a piece of fiction... BLITZER: He says the DRUDGE REPORT item sounds like a piece of fiction? CNN REPORTER: He did say that, but important to note he says he is not ruling it in or out.<<