SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (751205)10/6/2006 2:21:32 PM
From: pompsander  Respond to of 769670
 
you are absolutely right....



To: jlallen who wrote (751205)10/6/2006 2:30:32 PM
From: BEEF JERKEY  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
One thing is Iraqi's simply don't want to be a US controlled puppet - that’s why they are fighting back so hard against our occupation.



To: jlallen who wrote (751205)10/6/2006 3:29:11 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Correct, "WARNER hit the nail on the had" head..

there is no way the US military budget can compete in a assymetric fight, when $10 wipes out millions, as he said.

Twice as many soldiers would just increase the killed ones, those poor ones who have to get out of the walled compaonds to try to guard the perimeters, mortars, etc..

Smart guy to declare the War lost as late as now..

PS You obviously did not listen to what he said, all of it..
too occupied with imaging sexy emails??

Message 22885596

Anyway..

geocities.com



To: jlallen who wrote (751205)10/6/2006 8:08:35 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 769670
 
"the Iraqi people just have not stepped up to the plate to take advantage of the opportunity presented by SH's removal."

REALLY???????????

There are over 300,000 of them under Iraqi arms now (in the military or police forces)... not counting the numbers in the private armed militias or the insurgents.

Just how many need to be wearing uniforms to make you happy.

WHAT NUMBER are you looking for?