SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (305570)10/7/2006 8:07:46 AM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573639
 
I don't think ted understood my post. Kinda like Sprite, he had to find a way to get a shot at the republicans in it...



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (305570)10/7/2006 10:20:11 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573639
 
Wall Street's political cash favors Democrats By Tim McLaughlin
Fri Oct 6, 11:19 AM ET


Wall Street has shifted its allegiance in the 2006 election cycle by donating more to Democrats than Republicans who have been the investment banks' usual benefactors, U.S. Federal Election Commission data show.

Five leading firms Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Bear Stearns Companies Inc.,Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. have contributed $6.2 million so far to candidates before the November elections, with about 52 percent going to Democrats.

"People give ideological money and they give money to people they think are going to win," said Maurice Carroll, director of Quinnipiac University's Polling Institute in Hamden, Connecticut. "It looks like it's going to be a good year for Democrats."

Despite being awash in record profits, Wall Street executives, investment bankers, brokers and traders may be getting weary of Republican control, Carroll said. President George W. Bush's polling numbers are low and growing violence in Iraq also weighs heavy on Republican leadership, he said.

Meredith McGehee, policy director at The Campaign Legal Center, said Wall Street also may be concerned about the U.S. deficit, which has ballooned during the Bush administration.

"The last time the deficit was under control was under the Democrats," McGehee said.

Still, it's unlikely Wall Street would embrace higher taxes, a move some Democrats favor to cut the deficit.

The 2006 election cycle that began January 1, 2005, marks the first time in a dozen years that securities firms' donations have skewed leftward, according to analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks political contributions.

Democrats have received $23.8 million from Wall Street compared to $21.7 million for Republicans. Over the previous five election cycles, Republicans captured 52 to 58 percent of the industry's political donations.

About 80 percent of the contributions from the industry comes from employees. The rest comes from political action committees, which remain loyal to Republicans for lowering tax rates on dividends and capital gains, for example.

LONGTIME TIES TO WASHINGTON

Goldman Sachs, a firm with longtime ties to Washington, has contributed $2.6 million, the most in the industry, through its employees and its political action committee. Democrats have received 60 percent of that money, reflecting a trend that dates to at least 1990.

Morgan Stanley ranks second with $1.6 million in contributions, with 52 percent going to Republicans, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

The shift in overall contributions to Democrats reflects allegiance to New York's powerful Democratic senators, Hillary Clinton and Chuck Schumer, analysts said. Clinton, seen as a leading candidate for the White House in 2008, is the biggest beneficiary, receiving $1.1 million during the 2006 election cycle.

As chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), Schumer is using his home field advantage on Wall Street to outflank Republican fund-raisers. The DSCC, which wants to regain control of the senate, has raised $81.3 million compared to $69.2 million by the National Republican Campaign Committee.

For example, Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman's new chairman and chief executive, gave $25,000 to the DSCC. His predecessor, Henry Paulson, was a major Republican donor while at the firm before becoming Bush's treasury secretary.

RAISING MONEY EASILY

The industry has contributed $6.2 million to the DSCC, compared to only $2.6 million for the Republican's national committee. Schumer might easily raise money on Wall Street because he is a member of the Senate banking committee and chairman of the economic policy subcommittee.

"People from all walks of life -- including those in the finance world -- are tired of the Bush administration's inept management of the government and are looking to the Democrats to restore some accountability to Washington," DSCC spokesman Phil Singer said.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee wasn't available for comment.

One of Wall Street's leading political action committees, however, isn't tired of Republican candidates.

The Securities Industry Association, which represents Wall Street in Washington, gives more to Republicans because traditionally they're more likely to support the industry's agenda, such as in 2003 when the maximum tax rate on capital gains and dividends was lowered to 15 percent.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (305570)10/7/2006 3:00:19 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573639
 
From conservative Spokane.....in the red part of Washington state: ;-)

Our View: Grant the best choice

Democrat will be a moderate voice for Idaho

October 5, 2006

Many Idaho Republicans are still shaking their heads that abrasive conservative Bill Sali won their congressional primary.

House Speaker Bruce Newcomb and other Republican insiders secretly – or not so secretly – must wish that almost any of the other candidates had emerged from the six-person field to capture the nomination. Not only is Sali very conservative on social and fiscal issues, but his confrontational style alienates even fellow Republican legislators.
During the 2006 session, he angered Democrats so much during a debate about abortion that they walked out. Afterward, Newcomb said: "That idiot (Sali) is just an absolute idiot. He doesn't have one ounce of empathy in his whole fricking body. And you can put that in the paper."

Sali triggered the unusual response from a party leader with a dubious statement linking abortion with breast cancer. But that isn't all. When Republican Congressman Mike Simpson was speaker of the Idaho House, he once threatened to throw Sali out of a window in the state Capitol. If this is how friends react to Sali, including one whom he would serve with in Congress, how is he going to build consensus for issues and policies important to the state?


Rather than support a temperamental candidate with extreme positions, Idahoans should elect Democrat Larry Grant, a former vice president of Micron Technology who is fiscally conservative and socially moderate. Grant pinpointed the difference between Sali and himself at a Coeur d'Alene debate when he said: "If Mr. Sali goes to Congress, he moves his party to the right. If I go to Congress, I move my party closer to the middle."

Sali would further divide Congress. Grant would be a bridge builder.

Grant, who would be the first Democrat to hold the 1st Congressional District seat since 1994, holds reasonable positions on a range of issues. He reflects his Western conservatism by wanting to relax logging restrictions on federal lands. By supporting development of energy resources such as coal, natural gas and oil. By opposing the Kyoto Protocol to limit global warming.

His approach to the Iraq war and immigration are moderate, too. Grant believes, like many Americans, that this country should remain in Iraq but that our approach to winning the peace is flawed. We should concentrate on eliminating the violence to begin to win over the Iraqis. By contrast, Sali supports the Bush administration's uncompromising position, stating at the Lake City debate that the war on terrorism won't end until "there are no more Islamic fundamentalists who believe that they need to kill everyone who is a Christian or an infidel." Grant again shows his moderation in his belief that the United States should establish a temporary worker program to allow illegal aliens to work here legally. Sali would put military troops on the border to prevent illegal immigration.

In 1994, Idaho picked ultraconservative Helen Chenoweth-Hage over moderate Democrat incumbent Larry LaRocco after she won a GOP primary horse race, much as Sali did this year. Chenoweth-Hage then served three relatively ineffective terms in Congress before honoring her term-limits pledge. With only two seats in the House, Idaho can't afford to send another conservative flamethrower to Congress. Not only will Grant be in a good position to help Idaho if the Democrats regain the House, but he would work better with Republicans than Sali would if they don't.

spokesmanreview.com



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (305570)10/7/2006 3:36:05 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573639
 
Why is Bush suppressing this report?

Release of Iraq Report Sought

Democratic Rep. Jane Harman says the White House is suppressing a new intelligence document that gives a 'grim' view of the war.

By Greg Miller, Times Staff Writer
October 6, 2006

WASHINGTON — The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee accused the Bush administration Thursday of suppressing a classified intelligence report that paints a "grim" picture of the situation in Iraq.

Rep. Jane Harman (D-Venice) sent a letter to CIA Director Michael V. Hayden requesting the release of the report and charging that the agency was withholding the information out of political considerations, which she said was demoralizing to the agency's workforce.


"I believe that the intelligence community has produced an in-depth intelligence review of Iraq, but that the material has been stamped 'draft' and will not be finalized" until after the November election, Harman said in the letter, which was released by her office. "The integrity of the organization you lead is at stake."

The letter underscores the simmering political tensions in Washington over intelligence reports that have provided fodder for Democrats in their criticism of the Bush administration's foreign policy and management of the war in Iraq.

Last month, the White House, under pressure, declassified a separate intelligence assessment — called a National Intelligence Estimate — that concluded the Iraq war was exacerbating the Islamic terrorist threat by fueling resentment toward the United States and providing a training ground for terrorist recruits.

The director of national intelligence, John D. Negroponte, has acknowledged that the intelligence community is working on a new National Intelligence Estimate on the Iraq war. Such assessments represent the consensus views of all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies.

A spokesman for Negroponte's office said the latest intelligence estimate on Iraq was begun in August, and Bush administration officials have indicated that it is unlikely to be ready for release until next year.

Harman has expressed frustration with that timetable. She said Thursday that she had recently learned of a separate assessment on Iraq that was much closer to being finished.

In a conference call with reporters, Harman said she had few details on the document, but that she was "confident" that a completed draft was being held at the CIA. She said it should be made available to members of the House Intelligence Committee.

"I know that there is a substantially complete assessment on Iraq," Harman said. "I understand it is grim. I understand many working inside the intelligence community are frustrated because the release of that document is being blocked."

She declined to elaborate on the source of her information. The CIA said it received Harman's letter Thursday, and did not want to respond through the media.

"But it's wrong to suggest that the White House is preventing dissemination of analysis on Iraq," CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said. "CIA is committed to keeping Congress fully informed, and that includes its views of trends in Iraq. That's been done."

Harman's conference call was organized by a group of foreign policy experts and critics of the administration's handling of the war. Harman was joined on the call by Rand Beers, a former counter-terrorism official in the Bush White House, and Wendy Sherman, a former State Department official in the Clinton administration.

latimes.com