Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (205394)	10/9/2006 2:48:12 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 281500

Indeed! That is interesting. Thank you. www3.nationalgeographic.com M168 = Adam for the "out of Africa" tribes = 31,000 to 79,000 years ago. Mqurice's boe analysis of 31,416 years ago is actually the precise time; damn good boe analysis if I do say so myself, though I'm being a bit disingenuous in that I think my boe analysis was for ALL males, not just those out of Africa. I'll have to look further to see when Adam for those in Africa was born. Since by far the great majority of males live outside Africa, I hereby claim near enough precision. If there was some bloke 30,000 years before that who fathered the rest of the Africans, it doesn't make a big difference to the total picture. World population of males 3 billion. African males 350 million [about a tenth of the total]. Adjusted for GDP per capita, Africa doesn't count. I hereby claim a precise boe analysis. Mqurice