SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CommanderStupido who wrote (9970)10/9/2006 6:29:10 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218227
 
Come, CommanderNukeChinks, what did you or your alias say about concern for <<human life>>?

Or was it you, together with Bush-league, who specifically identified 'strategic competitor' to be dealt with?

Here is another point of view Message 22890868 , from Stratfor, which at least try to act as if it is thinking, even though it is just acting, but at least they got their alias in alignment with their pretension, unlike the unthinking imbeciles

you are sounding more and more upset, like a swatted fly, buzz, buzz, and yet, reality does not change, what is still is

Chugs, J



To: CommanderStupido who wrote (9970)10/9/2006 9:57:40 AM
From: Jim Fleming  Respond to of 218227
 
CNK re Us nuclear response

North Korea and Iran is what you get when you refuse to talk with any nation or power base that has problems with your your policies.

Jim



To: CommanderStupido who wrote (9970)10/9/2006 10:20:50 AM
From: gg cox  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218227
 
Three posts, 4 recommendations,strange, for one with politically incorrect handle.



To: CommanderStupido who wrote (9970)10/9/2006 11:53:27 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218227
 
CNC: Pakistan and India have nukes. Does it change anything?