Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: plantlife who wrote (213016)	10/9/2006 5:42:12 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Plantlife, > the G-bum making an extrapolation that since all this schooling was done, it meant there was no violations of the law. You're exaggerating. Here's GB's original post: investorshub.com He never said "there was (sic) no violations of the law." But he did say that the training goes against AMD's claim that Intel has a monopolistic pattern of conduct. > He refused to accept my comment that he could speak for only one Intel employee out of 100,000, namely himself. So GB is the only employee who ever got training. GB was kept in the dark while all his coworkers were out turning competitors into "guacamole." GB knows less than a guy like yourself who has already made up his mind regarding the other 99,999 employees of Intel. > Anyway, the thing that bothers you about me, is my preference for AMD. Try again. There are lots of AMD fans on this thread who don't bother me. Then there are the fanatics, especially those who flatter themselves just because I even bother responding to their B.S. Those are what we call "AMDroids." Tenchusatsu