Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (213049)	10/9/2006 3:48:59 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Respond to of 275872

Intel's lawyers should have been informing their staff of what practices were appropriate or not relative to the probability that they could be considered a monopoly at the time.* I.e. They should have been saying, "It's highly likely that we would be considered a monopoly in the eyes of the law, so we should really practice business under the assumption that we are a monopoly." My point exactly and I expect they were giving that advice. I also believe Intel was taking that advice and behaving accordingly, AMD's crybaby tantrums notwithstanding.