Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (79806)	10/10/2006 1:20:04 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

This is just taking the argument to a ridiculous extreme. Nothing ridiculous or even extreme about it at all It's not really relevant to my point about Iraq, nor does it refute it. I'm not sure that it refutes your intended point as much as it points out a weakness in how you expressed it. It depends on what you meant. If your point was just that Iraq's government relies on force than your point was correct but not very relevant. If your point is that Iraq isn't a democracy because it relies on a much greater degree of internal force than the US or Sweden, or that it can't be a democracy because it relies on force applied by the armies of other countries than your conflating democracy and security, and your point isn't correct. If your point is that Iraq is much more dependent on direct application of force than say Sweden the US, or most other democracies than your point is correct and relevant.