Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (95899)	10/10/2006 12:51:27 PM
From: Bill from Wisconsin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

It's about calling you a promoter? My gosh, that was about 17 posts into this thread already. I think you are a little too thin skinned for this message board stuff. What was the point of all this? I made 2 posts this morning about the naked shorting goofiness and spent the whole rest of the morning dealing with your hurt feelings over being called a promoter? Wow! No wonder they love you here ;-)

To: rrufff who wrote (95899)	10/10/2006 12:58:53 PM
From: Bill from Wisconsin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Uhm, no ""You have yet to show me a post that was purposely untrue or a manipulative P&D post. You attacked me. Then you whine, piss and moan that you get it back."" I just unfortunately got caught up in why you found these 2 posts so offensive you needed to spend all morning debating the meaning of the word "promoter" (which didn't appear until about 10 posts into the thread) You are too smart for me RRRufff. I'm sorry if you feel I attacked you. I'll remember your sensitive nature in the future. To: Buckey who wrote (95875) 10/10/2006 6:31:02 AM From: Bill from Wisconsin Read Replies (1) of 95901 How come no one talks about FTD's In the futures markets? Shorting seems to be rampant there yet no one complains? ;-) To: peter michaelson who wrote (95876) 10/10/2006 6:41:50 AM From: Bill from Wisconsin 2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) of 95901 The problem with enforcement on the OTCBB Is it's like trying to put out 20 house fires with one hose. The scammer's best shield is "due process". Exposing scams is easy. Prosecuting them takes gobs of time, armies of lawyers, and piles of cash. That's why you have so many pleas promising to not do it (get caught) again. Most rational people know that a high percentage OTC and pinks are clearly scams. Problem is you have at least 2 types of victims. Those that know the OTC is infested, but that they've found the diamond in the turd (Ruff)and those that know they have a turd but think they are smart enough to "trade" the turd.(Ruff) Neither one later wants to admit to the world that they can't recognize a turd staring them in the face.