Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (7606)	10/10/2006 5:07:43 PM
From: S. maltophilia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

No, I meant to point it out as a ridiculous way to manage a resource. I own what's under my land and what's under your land.

To: average joe who wrote (7606)	10/10/2006 7:08:10 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

No, I haven't been wrong once yet in our discussion. I just stated you can't own water. Never mind what the lawmakers say, you just can't own it. You can own a house. You can own a horse or a mule, You can't own water though, except as stated. Any argument that you own a particular piece of water just evaporates. If you say you own a particular piece of water in Canada, I would say actually I own it as it was in Scotland earlier, and we have been around longer as a country then Canada. see what I mean?