SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush Administration's Media Manipulation--MediaGate? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (8801)10/11/2006 6:40:12 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9838
 
North Korea got no nukes under Clinton, 10 or so nukes under Bush. That is the only real issue here. If it wasn't for nukes no one would give a damn about NK at all.

So which are you happier with, NK with nukes under Buish? Or with no nukes under Clinton?

Simple enough for you?

And don't believe the Newsmax BS out there. Clinton did not allow NK to build nukes. He kept them from doing it. Sure he bribed them, but it was worth it. Now Bush refuses to even talk to NK and they've got nukes, so this is a much more expensive problem. Just one more disasterous foreign policy failure of Bush. He has them all across the globe. And at home too. Basically everything is a big mess under Bush. We need new leadership. And We The People have the power to get it. We don't have to wait until 2008.