Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp. - A Scam? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: T E X who wrote (1645)	10/11/2006 11:37:23 PM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 4624

Yes,once you get the industry insiders fighting each other, more of the truth about NakedShortScamming should come out. After all, if it's "no problem" as the hedge fund defenders claim, why fight so hard to prevent the release of information that would make much of the discussion moot? Why fight rules that clearly define and enforce settlement of trades? Why fight rules that defines and enforces legal shorting? "my scam is ok, yours is not."

To: T E X who wrote (1645)	10/12/2006 6:39:48 AM
From: Purl Gurl	Respond to of 4624

RE: Hedge Funds / Naked Shorting, by Tex & rruff Tex and rruff discuss naked shorting. Those of you who know me from other websites, are aware I have been participating in this effort to not only bring an end to naked shorting but also to promote full transparency in the markets. You are also aware I have written literally hundreds of articles on this over very many years, along with being an active participant in requests for comments by the SEC for proposed rule changes. This is an area of my deep expertise. Harris has not "boxed" his stock, Harris is not effecting a short squeeze, Harris no control over shorting of his stock nor any control over naked shorting of his stock. There will not be a short squeeze and will never be a short squeeze. This is a scam stock, savvy traders are aware this is a scam stock and are taking full advantage of this scam status to make good profits. Of critical importance is for readers to keep in mind this is a scam stock and how this stock is traded is directly controlled by being a known scam stock. This is brief synopsis of why shorting of this stock is so very successful. Knowing this is a scam stock, traders are well aware share prices will be extremely volatile, exhibiting wild swings up and down. There is no reason to cover shorts within any time frame. Prices will swing so much, so often, it is a certainty shorts can be covered many times into the future. Adding to this, a great number of naked shorts will never be covered, there is no need to cover. Continuing my synopsis, many naked shorts will never be covered because of exemptions to SHO and because counterfeit shares are being introduced and it appears a lot more counterfeit shares are coming out of the Berlin exchange with the recent listing over there. Tex touches upon Hedge Funds. These are a type of trader who are absolutely exempt from SHO and are equally exempt from having to cover shorts. Market Makers are also exempt from SHO. These issues are not difficult to understand but readers _must_ research regulation SHO in great detail to realize SHO is nothing more than a publicity stunt, a ruse. I urge readers to study up on SHO and exemptions so when you both write and read articles, you will perform either from a position of knowledge. Adding weight to this common knowledge shorts and naked shorts do not have to be covered within any set time frame, if ever covered, is this recent uproar over the Utah law and the now political agenda to clamp down on shorts, which, in itself, this political agenda, is a ruse to garner votes. An exception is the Utah law. This is a sincere effort by the governor of Utah to protect traders. To summarize and to close, CSHD is a known scam stock. Shorters know there is no hurry to cover because, in time, CSHD will crash down, severely. There is no time frame for covering shorts. Naked shorts are most often never covered. Counterfeit shares are beginning to flow in from the Berlin. SHO has no enforcement ability, there is no rule which allows Harris nor the SEC to force covering of shorts. More brief, it is literally impossible for Harris to effect a short squeeze. Readers will learn this is so very true upon studying and learning about shorts, naked shorts and regulation SHO, learning in great depth rather than a shallow understanding. Claims of effecting a short squeeze are pure deceit and part of this deceit is convincing share holders to pull paper certificates, a major mistake by those share holders. Purl Gurl * because of so many threats by Harris and others to effect litigation against the many, I am annoyed to have to add, I am expressing personal opinion. These threats of litigation, as other threats, are nothing more than attempts to silence the voice of truth, which is the most feared voice of all. .