Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (306146)	10/12/2006 11:12:22 AM
From: bentway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576180

I'd begin talks to see if we could return to the Clinton regieme, where we had their spent nuclear fuel in cooling ponds under UN monitoring. Then take it from there. Use some CARROT, less STICK. All Bush has is threats he can't back up with STICK, due to the Iraq quagmire. Bush lied to us once again when he said the Clinton approach wasn't working - it was working far better than HIS approach. The NK were enriching uranium, but they WEREN'T reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, which is a much more efficient and rapid process. He also lied when he said the NK's were cheating, since the Clinton agreement didn't cover enriching uranium - so, technically, they weren't cheating. But Bush treated them like they were, and they immediately began reprocessing spent nuclear fuel, and now have a bomb.