Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (306167)	10/12/2006 12:22:47 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1577095

The current NK nukes are ALL on Bush. Nonsense. The nuclear program continued, probably without serious pause, from at least when Clinton was president, more likely from at least the 80s. And they where well on there way to a nuclear weapon by the time Bush took office. Maybe they have enough material to make a larger amount of bombs now than they would have if Bush had kept to the fiction that the North Koreans were not building nukes, but so what? They would still have been able to build a bomb, and the capability would continue to increase. If the fiction was maintained than nothing would have been done and they would have slowly built up their arsenal. A chance, even if it isn't a very large chance, to stop the process, is worth a slight acceleration of it, and if the NK regime thought they needed to have the acceleration they could have done it at any time. The very fact that NK was easily able to "kick out the UN, unplug the cameras, and begin reprocessing spent fuel" shows that the restrictions in place where not serious restrictions. The NK's let them remain in place only because they thought they could continue there program in secret.