SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ichy Smith who wrote (16966)10/12/2006 3:16:43 PM
From: ILCUL8R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32591
 
Perhaps you should stop flipping criticisms at each other and read this book:

amazon.com

The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War Without End by Peter W. Galbraith

Galbraith, a leading commentator on Iraq thanks to his recent articles in the New York Review of Books, presents a clear-eyed and persuasive case against the Bush administration's nation-building project there. As a former U.S. diplomat with long experience in Iraq, he offers an insider's view of the American occupation's failures—the poor preparation for post-invasion chaos, the cluelessness about Iraqi politics, the incompetence and corruption of the occupation authority—while advancing a deeper critique. With Saddam's dictatorship and the Baathist party and army that supported it gone, he contends that Iraq is irrevocably splitting into a pro-American Kurdistan in the north, a pro-Iranian Shiite south and an ungovernable Sunni center. America "cannot put the country back together again and it cannot stop the civil war," he insists. Deeply skeptical of attempts to reunify the Iraqi state, he proposes that the U.S. withdraw from Arab Iraq and "facilitate an amicable divorce" between the fractious sections. Galbraith advised the Iraqi Kurds during recent constitutional negotiations and is palpably sympathetic to their national aspirations; his argument sometimes feels like a brief for Kurdish separatism. Still, Galbraith's authoritative grasp of the issues and his cogent, forthright call for disengagement ensure that the book will move into the center of the debate over American policy in Iraq. (July 17)



To: Ichy Smith who wrote (16966)10/12/2006 4:26:49 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32591
 
I thought this would be the outcome of a military intervention. Since I was right about it not having any chance of success, I currently favor a political solution crafted by Iraqis. But since there are at least 3 factions with differing ideas of what to do, witness the Iraqi-Iraqi violence, we now have a civil war.

I'm not sure what Iraqis want. Perhaps it is a three state solution. Perhaps it is a united Iraq. Let Iraqis sort it out. We need to get our troops out of the way. We can stand on the sidelines and offer support to any peaceful outcome, while making sure that terrorists don't show up trying to tip the balance in their favor. There are little or no non Iraqi "terrorists" in country. In fact if the US leaves, I believe that the Iraqis will self cleanse themselves of outsiders, who they may be tolerating right now seeing them as common enemies of the occupier, the US.

We need to change course, no doubt, for the current course has proven to be unworkable.

Bottom line, let Iraqis solve Iraqi problems.