Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (306245)	10/13/2006 10:18:50 AM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572544

Do you have no sense of morality? Oh please, you lecturing me on morality, that's too funny to even be taken seriously. You guys had no morality issues with a married President that actually had sex with a young intern, Then lied in a COURT OF LAW about it, but now are up in arms with a congressman that didn’t have sex with a Page? Too funny. Your lie was debunked by the 9/11 commission. It was? Did you actually read the 16 page link to the 9/11 commission report linked in the article of your post? Or are you just repeating the left wing-nut mantra. I suspect it's the latter. even though the 9-11 Commission found no "reliable evidence to support" Please don't use quotation marks on a bald face lie, those words are nowhere in the 9/11 report. Have you no morality at all? So if it was a lie why is Clinton telling us in this tape that he turned down the opportunity in this audio tape? : newsmax.com ..that distorted a 2002 statement by Clinton. They distorted? How? The clip of him talking in my link is 30 seconds long, so they're not taking it out of context. Please explain how they distorted it? Just because you left wingers repeat the mantra intended to protect your god Clinton, doesn't make it true. Also Clinton claimed several times including in the above audio tape that he had no basis to hold OBL. This was a Clinton speech made in 2002. Yet now, in 2006, he claims he was obsessed with the capture of OBL though-out his Presidency? Don't you see a little problem with his attempts at revisionist history here? Probably not, your Tin Foil Hat reception is just fine. Jim