Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J.B.C. who wrote (306292)	10/13/2006 4:39:32 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572751

Bush is the only one who let Osama go and ignored warnings. Clinton was actually very much on the ball, and any one of his 150 cruise missiles could have done the job on OBL and the others. In fact, CLinton stopped the 1999 LAX bombing and killed a lot of Al Qaida trainees, just not the bosses. Bush had the bosses trapped at Tora Bora long after we knew they were guilty of 9-11, USS Cole and embassy bombings, and Bush did nothing, just let him go. Any idea why Bush would let Osama Bin Laden go? Any theories? And why Bush would ignore the 8-6-01 warning and other warnings which were so clear? And why did Bush just sit there on 9-11 reading "My Pet Goat" while the WTC was burning down? Why did he let Cheney take control? Why was his first meeting at the WH with Prince Bandar? Why did he let all the Saudis out of the US after 9-11 without interrogation? And why did he tell Richard Clarke he wanted 9-11 blamed on Saddam Hussein?