Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (7659)	10/15/2006 4:26:29 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36921

eugenics That sort of thing is very much in the domain of biology. Cattle are bred for certain characteristics. We all have heard of genetically modified crops. It's really down to what you think is right or good for the human race and.... ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE GLOBAL WARMING ISSUE So why don't you and Micheal Chrichton take a break from deliberately trying to confuse these totally different subjects. Science I will listen to, quackery ... no thank you. Please no more QUACK QUACK QUACK on eugenics (wrt the GW issue) from yourself and Micheal Chrichton. He takes note that "it's a separate issue" and almost in the same sentence implies that anyone studying the scientific evidence (re: global warming) are goose stepping nazies. EVERYONE can see it's just plain bullshit. btw, I don't know if you actually read any scientific literature but subjects like genetic modification and breeding animals to give certain characteristics are very much at the forefront of scientific research and ethical consideration. And your quoting us the state of affairs back in the 1920's? I can imagine the people in Bangladesh really appreciate your humanity. There, that struck a note didn't it? -g-