Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Aloha who wrote (22805)	10/16/2006 1:20:31 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78416

This is only talk talk from Morales. At least this is what I am hearing from sources close to Comibol. ANyway, we will find out by month end.

To: Mr. Aloha who wrote (22805)	10/16/2006 1:45:49 PM
From: koan	Respond to of 78416

bolivia, great post Mr Aloha

To: Mr. Aloha who wrote (22805)	10/16/2006 2:24:20 PM
From: jackjc	Respond to of 78416

Yes, the other show has dropped, using the clash as an excuse. Though only mentioning tin, silver and gold, I doubt that any serious investing will take place in zinc or any metal for quite a while in Bolivia.

To: Mr. Aloha who wrote (22805)	10/16/2006 2:30:28 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78416

The changes are in the way underlying land tenure is expressed, in who is said to 'own' each hectare with its resources ... doesn't necessarily mean confiscation of operations, or of profits from them, although it may ... will they be stupid enough to kill the golden goose, this is the question, so far they're just saying they 'own' it Not all that much different from other jurisdictions - we speak of 'freehold' and 'fee simple' and all that fine olde english yeomanry self-delusion of independence, but try this experiment in British Columbia - Don't pay your taxes for about a year and an half, and then tell us who 'owns' 'your land' -g- [edit] - i do agree with jack's post [next after this one], that there is a perception of imminent confiscation possiblilities, and it's not going to go away easily, and that perception is the hard reality du jour ... just meant to make the point that in no country is the individual considered sovereign