Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: loantech who wrote (22809)	10/16/2006 1:26:06 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78417

Until a mine is in commercial production and making money there is always something pending. PLM is permitting. MMGG is water. I remember Hecla having a positive feasibility on a deposit in the USA.(the deposit was Grouse Creek, but not sure). They buld the mill and start operating. But later found out that the ore was no good. bettermines.org Heard also of a group in Colorado who was stock by environmentalist... You know Tom, there is always a risk. That is why it is better to diversify. Western Goldfields is very interesting... but not because it is in California. If you want my opinion, Chile and Guyana are as good as California when it comes to mining. And Peru, Brazil, Argentina not far behind