SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush Administration's Media Manipulation--MediaGate? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (8832)10/17/2006 12:11:21 PM
From: JBTFD  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9838
 
However low the barrier may be, there are some people to whom it is a financial hardship to purchase an official picture ID. This is putting a price on the right to vote.

Some people may believe that those without money should not have the right to vote. The the question becomes where do we draw the line on the wealth or income scale as the cutoff of who is allowed to vote and who isn't.

As far as I'm concerned the laws we have are sufficient. What we need is enforcement, not more laws. It is already illegal for a non citizen to vote.

I personally think the intent of this law is to scare people off. Just like the republicans calling felons in states where it was legal for them to vote and telling them if they voted they would be thrown in jail, the intent is to disenfranchise.



To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (8832)10/19/2006 2:10:43 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 9838
 
Re: Why is it that the only ideas republicans seem to have about voting are along the lines of making it harder to cheat?

That is a question that answers itself. The real question is why democrats promote voter fraud.

Perhaps that question answers itself too.