Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (148975)	10/17/2006 5:53:26 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 150070

What's the point of your post? Seems like you're really trying to digggg deeply on a day that that stock is up big with something very old and, assuming you are right, factored in to the share price. Did you miss the run from .105 to .145. Nice run, wouldn't you admit? Assuming you are right and it's no big deal, what does that prove? Half the wormiestyle posts claim no assets. So, I guess it's kind of like multiple choice. If a basher wants to bash SLJB, he takes the big bash and claims no assets. Then assuming he's proven wrong with financials, he claims the assets aren't worth quite as much. Then if he's wrong there, he claims that some aspect of the business plan isn't quite as valuable. It's called MGB - Moronic Generic Bashing. So far, the MGB and FUD attempts have failed miserably on LFWK/SLJB as most of us have had a wonderful ride from .002's, but I'm sure you guys will try something different tomorrow. Spelling errors? Grammar errors?