SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (3074)10/17/2006 5:48:31 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 10087
 
I see. That makes sense.



To: one_less who wrote (3074)10/17/2006 6:39:38 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10087
 
In Lay's case, there had not been a final judgment entered, which gave the judge the power to vacate the conviction. Vacating the conviction was discretionary, not mandatory.

The persons defrauded by Lay still have the right to bring civil actions against his estate. The smarter ones filed their civil actions the day he died, or the day after he died.
jurist.law.pitt.edu



To: one_less who wrote (3074)10/18/2006 6:52:41 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10087
 
How about if someone successfully (for a time) faked their death, after a conviction but before the appeal is finished (presumably while out on bail, I think it would be hard to fake your death while in prison)