Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (3087)	10/17/2006 6:31:23 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

"I just don't see how that's different from him doing it earlier in the process, which we don't penalize." oh I see. There is a difference in that judgement in my example has already been delivered. Then the appeal. Earlier in the process also could create the same result but not necessarily. Earlier in the process the suicide could be a way out of dealing with the humiliation of being charged. I suppose that could be true in either case but the former has already been adjudicated once. It seems we should have some provisions for dealing with both types of situations. Like, if you commit, you lose your appeal/case unless there is someone remaining who could plead the case. Maybe that is already what happens.