Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (137595)	10/18/2006 1:23:22 PM
From: Galirayo	Respond to of 209892

Not to me .. it sounds like you're kind enuff to share your thoughts with enuff detail so that we Slow Learners can "Actually" understand. I arrived at my A=C target the same way you did I think .. but the data may be different. 13.33 is what I have. But 1372.87 .. yields 1359.54. Cool ... Thank[s] You Sir !!!! [s] was on purpose .. = more than 1. ;)

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (137595)	10/18/2006 1:27:01 PM
From: skinowski	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

Speaking of Shack - what is happening with our Dear Leader?... -g

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (137595)	10/18/2006 3:12:42 PM
From: The Freep	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

MC -- you've been spot on lately, but I gotta say in this wiggle area, I just don't know what to make of things at all. Yes, yesterday could be a fave waver down for an A and we moved up in 3 waves with a very sharp C of that move coming this morning... but since then? It's messy. Not a C down look. And I think this goes back to what Shack was saying that the trend is still up, so wiggling like this is fraught with difficulties as, until proven otherwise, it's just as likely we find a way to keep moving higher. Perhaps my post will now mark the top of this rally, with incredible down (a iii of 3 of C!) beginning, but I keep looking for ways that up makes sense. I know that messes up your bigger count, but again... even shortish term despite any rationalizations to the contrary... it's rather uppish!