Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim S who wrote (3124)	10/18/2006 4:41:30 PM
From: JBTFD	Respond to of 10087

If it's true that only one party's voter rolls are being tested, that should be a criminal offence. I agree with that. Also the way this was alleged to be done was totally crooked. The letter sent was supposedly crafted to look like one of those news letters that one gets from various government or public entities. There was no warning that it was a reply or get dropped letter except in the last paragraph of a 4 page letter. That is totally crooked. That should also be illegal in my opinion. Also the timing of the letter is to maximize disenfranchisement. If it is true that they sent over one million letters out that leaves very little time for the processing of the replies. And if there are any discrepancies then even less time to deal with those. It should be illegal to purge voter rolls without giving sufficient time for voters to validate their legitimate voting status.