Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SargeK who wrote (2886)	10/19/2006 2:03:34 PM
From: Kpainfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50708

Sarge, Thanks for the advice. But our government wouldn't let anything bad happen to us would they? Couldn't they just raise some taxes, print some more money, and then everyone could be taken care of? Everyone could work and then chip into a central fund and then the government could fairly redistribute it to those in need and pay for everything. Isn't that what's kinda happening now anyway? Thanks, Ken

To: SargeK who wrote (2886)	10/20/2006 12:39:08 PM
From: surelockhomes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50708

Before you have a baby, you better set aside $1 million for all of the food, clothing and other things it will need during it's life. Oh and you better set aside a few more million in case that baby grows up and starts having babies. Why not include all the other things in the Federal budget. Aren't those also future obligations, like the obligation to defend this country? It must be at least a billion trillion over the next 500 years, when you include that. It's all pay-go. No pay, no go. Future obligations, smobligations. It don't mean Jack Squat.