SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (206535)10/19/2006 3:07:29 PM
From: Ichy Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
But if The US hadn't been attacked and he was the head of a nation with a badly equipped military that had only done peacekeeping for years, and didn't even have a way to transport that many men, what would Clinton have done?
We ended up in Afghanistan cause Martin didn't want to go to Iraq.



To: geode00 who wrote (206535)10/19/2006 4:02:03 PM
From: Ichy Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
DEFINE LIBERAL, not as the name a party gives itself but as a political ideology.

What bloody difference does a definition make?

Classical liberalism. Coming from libertas, meaning "liberty" or "freedom", this concept refers to freedom from control by government, tradition, or an established church. It typically celebrates the potential of the individual and is more the antecedent of today's conservatism than of New Deal liberalism.

What you're talking about is CORRUPTION not LIBERALISM or CONSERVATISM. Slapping a label on a corrupt politician and claiming that the label, and not his actions, define him is nonsense.

I didn't put the labels on the parties. I didn't slap a label on a politician. These are the labels they use as their names. How do you refer to the Liberal Party of Canada if you don't use the word Liberal. You are trying to claim the term liberal as not being applicable to the Liberal Party of Canada, in many ways you are right, but I cannot change that.