Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (10288)	10/20/2006 2:27:46 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217820

do you mean to say we did not take a few steps down that path, as carranza2 and i agreed? or do you mean you have conceived notions that had been panning out? or do you simply want to argue without debating?

To: Ilaine who wrote (10288)	10/20/2006 2:55:16 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217820

<<verification of your pre-conceived notions>> ... or perhaps you meant that gold did not double against DJIA since we first discussed the notion ... maybe you still figure the adventure in the middle east is a good idea ... possibly you actually remain steadfast in your idea that bush is aided by brilliant folks or, per record of SI, some of us have been wrong, most of the time, for all the obvious reasons, while some of us have been correct, much of the time, because we can see the obvious from i of 14k posts to you of 41k posts btw, i was planning to ping you November 3rd, but, now will do as well, for exercise p.s. if i am mistaken in taking your post to me as a personal attack, i apologize in advance of illumination on that mistake, otherwise, at the risk of sounding idiotic and acting moronic, as someone once said, "bring it on !"