Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (10297)	10/20/2006 3:40:29 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220341

Where did the Tibetans get their idea that they were not part of China? I recall the USA, when it was young, decided they were not part of Great Britain and not serfs of the state of King George III. The fact that King George III and TJ demand that their serfs obey their strictures doesn't make TJ and other slave-drivers correct. The fact that somebody's ancestors might have paid "tribute" doesn't confer an obligation on descendants to do the same. Slavery went out of fashion long ago TJ. China use to pay tribute to Genghis, but that doesn't mean you should work in Hong Kong to pay some layabout descendant of Genghis and the Khan Klan. Though you are no doubt doing that. Mqurice