Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7456)	10/21/2006 1:11:55 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224705

Starr never should have been investigating the president's sex life. That was highly unethical and unnecesary. It had nothing to do with Whitewater. Besides, consensual sex is perfectly legal, though certainly embarrassing. Since when it is the job of a prosecutor to politically embarrass one party or the other? They are supposed to be carrying out serious non-partisan criminal investigations, not tabloid scandal searches. Starr has gone on to reveal he is is not only highly partisan but highly unethical. Last year he was busted for fraud for fabricating phony evidence in a case he was working on. SO, by Starr and the GOIP's standards, now we should be ready to put Bush and Cheney on the stand and ask them embarrassing questions about their personal lives. How about dealing with the Tammi Phillips and Jeff Gannon matters, for instance? A Houston stripper who says she had a long affair with Bush in the mid 90's? A gay escort allowed in the White House 202 times in 2003 without credentials? Why? Put them under oath and let's ask. We'd also need to measure Bush's penis and call in Cheney's proctologist to find out if he's really as biog a A-hole as he seems.