Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7463)	10/21/2006 1:28:19 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224707

Clinton would beat Bush by 35% if they could run against each other. This is baseed purely on performance. Clinton was one of our finest, most successful and (ironically) most honest presidents. Bush is one of the worst in all categories except cheating and lying to win elections.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7463)	10/24/2006 3:37:40 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224707

Clinton can now afford Viagra and the competing drugs. He has never had very high standards. Why shouldn't some middle aged divorcee find him attractive if he flatters her and it is the first romantic interest she has generated in years?