SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Charters who wrote (23212)10/21/2006 4:15:48 PM
From: marcos  Respond to of 78419
 
Uh-oh, not enough coffee, you're right, 0.5% = 11 pounds/t ... i was just looking at Brilliant's 2%+ nickel at Lanfranchi and had the 44 lbs/t stuck in mind

There will come enviro objections as a matter of course, you get this with any mine anywhere, and double in BC ... whether they'll find anything substantial to object over at Schaft Creek, that's the question ... sensitive waterway, roadbuilding in alpine paradise, endangered flea species, something like that ... don't know about this

Yes, big money to develop, that's why mining is a ways off at this point ... but it will eventually be mined [same might be said for Windy Craggy too, which does none of us any good] .... i checked, and hold mmgg-to-cuu at a ratio of 4.6-to-1 [by dollar value of acb], not 3-to-1 ... but i managed to buy cuu below its current price, unlike mmgg, so it doth make the heart gladder, for now



To: E. Charters who wrote (23212)10/21/2006 5:59:55 PM
From: jackjc  Respond to of 78419
 
They show $400-600M scenarios, 600 maybe realistic.

Look at III go after BC Metals nearby which has lesser deposit
by far. And resisting going to the altar, poison pills, etc.