SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (307363)10/23/2006 7:26:36 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577025
 
I disagree with this; let the process do the vetting wrt experience.

The Obama Bandwagon
By BOB HERBERT
Boston

The capacity crowd on a rainy night at the John F. Kennedy Library couldn’t have been happier. The guest of honor had been born the same year that J.F.K. was inaugurated, and now he was generating the kind of political delirium we have tended to associate with the Kennedys.

I was the interviewer that night, and as I arrived in a cab outside the library, the driver said, “Who’s on the program?” When I said, “Barack Obama,” the driver replied, “Oh, our next president.”

It’s a measure of how starved the country is for a sensible, appealing, intelligent, trustworthy leader that a man who until just a couple of years ago was an obscure state senator in Illinois is now suddenly, in the view of an awful lot of voters, the person we should install in the White House.

At the Kennedy Library forum on Friday night, Mr. Obama declined to rule out a run for the White House in 2008. In an appearance on “Meet the Press” yesterday, he made it clear that he was considering such a run.

With all due respect to Senator Obama, this is disturbing. He may be capable of being a great president. Someday. But one quick look around at the state of the nation and the world tells us that we need to be more careful than we have been in selecting our leaders. There shouldn’t be anything precipitous about the way we pick our presidents.

That said, the Barack Obama boom may well have legs. During the forum, every reference to the possibility of him running drew a roar from the audience. He’s thoughtful, funny and charismatic. And there is not the slightest ripple of a doubt that he wants to run for president.

The reason he went into politics, he said, was to be able to influence events, to make a difference. “Obviously,” he added, “the president has the most influence.”

I asked what thoughts run through his mind when he thinks about himself and the presidency. He said: “That office is so different from any other office on the planet, you have to understand that if you seek that office you have to be prepared to give your life to it. How I think about it is that you don’t make that decision unless you are prepared to make that sacrifice, that trade-off.

“What’s difficult and important for somebody like myself, who has a wonderful, forbearing wife and two gorgeous young children, is that they end up having to make some of those sacrifices with you. And that’s a profound decision that we won’t make lightly.”

I asked if he could imagine himself, at some point, making the kind of commitment he described. He said that he could, and the crowd erupted.

I asked if he might run in 2008. He said he was focused on the coming Congressional elections.

“So you have not ruled it out,” I said.

“We’ll leave it there,” he said.

The giddiness surrounding the Obama phenomenon seems to be an old-fashioned mixture of fun, excitement and a great deal of hope. His smile is electric, and when he laughs people tend to laugh with him. He’s the kind of politician who makes people feel good.

But the giddiness is crying out for a reality check. There’s a reason why so many Republicans are saying nice things about Mr. Obama, and urging him to run. They would like nothing more than for the Democrats to nominate a candidate in 2008 who has a very slender résumé, very little experience in national politics, hardly any in foreign policy — and who also happens to be black.

The Republicans may be in deep trouble, but they believe they could pretty easily put together a ticket that would chew up Barack Obama in 2008.

My feeling is that Senator Obama may well be the real deal. If I were advising him, I would tell him not to move too fast. With a few more years in the Senate, possibly with a powerful committee chairmanship if the Democrats take control, he could build a formidable record and develop the kind of toughness and savvy that are essential in the ugly and brutal combat of a presidential campaign.

After the interview at the Kennedy Library, hundreds of people lined up to have copies of Mr. Obama’s book, “The Audacity of Hope,” autographed. He signed as many as he could. Then he shook hands with everyone who remained and assured them that he would have their books delivered to his hotel, where he would sign them later that night.

He’s 45. There’s no hurry. He should take all the time he needs.



To: tejek who wrote (307363)10/23/2006 10:42:51 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577025
 
As G.O.P. Mopes, Bush Adds the Duties of Optimist in Chief
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG and JIM RUTENBERG
WASHINGTON, Oct. 22 — The capital is filled with Republicans convinced that they will lose the House and maybe the Senate. So last week, the White House and party leaders convened a “friends and allies” teleconference to dispute what Ken Mehlman, chairman of the Republican National Committee, considers flawed conventional wisdom.

For 20 minutes, Mr. Mehlman and the White House political director, Sara Taylor, tried to lift the cloak of gloom that has descended on the top ranks of Republican strategists, using what one of the dozens of lobbyists, donors, party aides and other supporters who listened in later called “happy talk.”

President Bush and his political strategists may be the most outwardly optimistic Republicans in Washington these days, and perhaps the only ones. They are doing their best to fend off the sense of impending doom within their party that they fear will become a self-fulfilling prophecy on Nov. 7.

They are enlisting longtime allies for an all-hands-on-deck effort to change the mood for the final push to Election Day, and they are putting out the word for Republicans to keep a lid on any pessimistic talk. They are also planning a travel blitz for Mr. Bush during the final week to 10 days of the campaign.

And though they fully expect to lose seats, they are also keeping their fingers crossed. They are counting on a barrage of last-minute advertising and their 72-hour voter turnout operation to keep Democrats from taking over the House and Senate, even if it means they only eke out a victory.

But those the White House counts on to help raise party morale at such low moments say they are having a hard time of it, when so many polls augur ever-worsening election results and when so many things have gone wrong, including the Mark Foley scandal and grim news from Iraq.

“I’m trying to buck people up, but let’s just say I’m hiding all the sharp objects in my office,” said Rich Bond, a former Republican National Committee chairman who now runs a consulting firm.

Even Mary Matalin, the longtime Bush family aide and confidante, confessed, “I’m in my stoic mode now,” though she said she believed that the party would prove the dire predictions wrong.

Mr. Bush has been saying for months that he believes Republicans will keep control of the House and the Senate, and he is not changing his tune now, even if it means taking the rare step of rebuking his own father.

In an interview shown Sunday on ABC News, Mr. Bush was asked about a comment by the first President Bush, who said this month that he hated to think about life for his son if Democrats took control of Congress. “He shouldn’t be speculating like that, because he should have called me ahead of time,” the president said, “and I’d tell him they’re not going to.”

The president’s professed certainty, shared with outside friends and advisers, is a source of fascination among even his staunchest allies. In lobbying shops and strategy firms around town, the latest Republican parlor game is divining whether the White House optimism is staged, or whether Mr. Bush and his political team really believe what they are saying.

There are hints that the mood is not so upbeat or unremittingly confident in the West Wing. Mr. Bush and his inner circle, people in regular contact with them say, are well aware of the Democratic surge recorded by polls, and of the stakes for the final two years of an administration already burdened with troubles like the deteriorating situation in Iraq.

A strategist close to the White House said Mr. Bush’s own political team had polling that showed as many as 14 House seats were probably already lost to Democrats, just one shy of the 15 seats they need to gain to win control.

Though White House aides said that account was exaggerated, they acknowledged that polls have shown at least that many races with Democrats leading Republicans. “Their attitude is, ‘We’ve got our backs against the wall, but we know how to fight our way out of this,’ ” said Charles Black, a Republican strategist who has been in regular contact with Karl Rove, Mr. Bush’s senior adviser. “They’re not unrealistic, but they’re optimistic that we can still win.”

Officials are telling their friends that they believe a final volley of intensive attacks by the White House will return the party to where it was before the Foley scandal, by casting the election as a choice between Democrats and Republicans over national security and taxes.

Mr. Bush and Mr. Rove are discounting predictions of Republican demise in part because they believe they have turned out wrong before. “I remember 2004,” Mr. Bush said in the interview shown on “This Week.” “I was history as far as the punditry was concerned.”

Mr. Rove has told associates that the party’s turnout machinery, through which the White House will continue to pump an unrelenting message against Democrats on taxes and terrorism, gives Republicans an advantage of four to seven percentage points in any given race. Though Democrats call that too generous, they acknowledge that it accounts for at least a few percentage points.

Mr. Rove and Ms. Taylor are said by associates to have spent hours going through data on volunteer efforts, voter registration tallies and financial matchups between candidates throughout the states, and they see a path to victory.

“You’ve got 452 races this year; many of them are already settled,” Tony Snow, the White House spokesman, said in an interview on Sunday. “Our view is fight hard to win the ones you can win. And we think there are enough of those that we will win both houses.”

For all the difficulties this year, Mr. Bush is said to have full confidence in Mr. Rove, Mr. Mehlman and Ms. Taylor.

Mr. Bush has always relished political combat. On the campaign trail, he can be seen slapping backs and clapping hands with coachlike enthusiasm, even as he embraces candidates whose campaigns seem like lost causes.

And far more than he lets on, Mr. Bush is a student of politics, up to speed on the nuances of races and tactics. Meeting with conservative talk radio hosts last month, Mr. Bush expressed optimism that Republicans would win. But he also lamented that victory would come in spite of “stupid moves” by some candidates, according to one host, Michael Medved, who participated in the meeting and wrote about it on his Web site.

Saulius Anuzis, the chairman of the Michigan Republican Party, said that on two recent occasions, Mr. Bush indicated that he understood the minutia of the state’s electorate and how it would affect the Republican candidate for Senate there, Sheriff Michael J. Bouchard of Oakland County. “He knew more than the perfunctory,” Mr. Anuzis said. “He said having the sheriff out of Oakland County, which is a swing county, ought to be a big help.”

In some respects, Mr. Bush has been stuck in the stable this political season, with low approval ratings that have made him less of an asset on the campaign trail, unlike in 2002 when he blitzed through the states giving pep talks and rallies as a far more popular president. White House aides say it has been far more important to have the president helping to raise money, often at closed events, than to have him at rallies that cost money to organize.

His schedule has not seemed as packed as Mr. Snow and other aides predicted last month, when they said he was likely to be on the road almost constantly through October. The president’s schedule for this week shows him campaigning on only two days, Tuesday and Thursday, in Florida, Iowa and Michigan.

But aides said rallies and fund-raisers in the final week of the campaign would keep him front and center, making an increasingly pointed argument against Democrats.

The president’s stump speech is the only place where he publicly contemplates Democratic control, raising it only to motivate Republicans. Mr. Bush’s aides say he has refused to let them even be seen planning for a possible Democratic takeover so as not to give volunteers or donors any reason to doubt that their efforts will pay off.

And he demonstrates annoyance with questions about what his administration is doing to plan for a potential Democratic takeover of the House.

“I don’t buy into that premise,” Mr. Bush told Bill O’Reilly of Fox News. Calling the query a “trick question,” he added: “The minute I start answering your question, the word is ‘Well, Bush anticipates losing.’ I don’t anticipate losing.”