SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (2948)10/22/2006 9:59:18 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50134
 
i like what you say. meaning. it is thoughtful, or certainly, well spoken.

but there are shifting dynamics in the fore. you know what i mean.

so what about em. ?

as you know the damange never lasts for ever. 40 years maybe, but never forever LOL. 1929.



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (2948)10/22/2006 10:00:42 PM
From: Jamey  Respond to of 50134
 
I bought most of my physical holdings in 2001 and I'm ahead of the game. Been sleeping real well. Other than that I have oil holdings because I like this bottom. As I said, I believe we will see $60 oil after the election.

Santi



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (2948)10/22/2006 10:18:00 PM
From: roguedolphin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50134
 
Slider....Do you think Iran gets attacked anytime soon?

The investment implications of this happening or not are huge in my opinion.

If this truly IS a "New Paradigm"....I would guess that any long range plans afoot to plunder and attack Iran will have to be cancelled???

"New Paradigm" replaces the "New World Order"???.....

......otherwise the New World Order marches on.

Rogue



To: SliderOnTheBlack who wrote (2948)10/25/2006 12:53:59 PM
From: RonMerks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50134
 
Golds negative corelation to Stocks?

This is a great chart from Steve Saville.



A large part of the pension fund, insurance company and institutional investing in commodities is because of their need to be negatively corelated to stocks. That chart from Saville shows that strong historic negative corelation. If the stock market continues to rally, gold should collapse for history to hold.

Comments anyone?

This last paragraph is interesting.

*"After the public becomes totally convinced that the future trend is going to be in one direction and bets accordingly the weight of its betting changes the odds to the point where the probability of these bets paying-off becomes exceedingly low. The public's enthusiasm for a particular type of investment or investing strategy therefore paves the way for the cycle to change and for a very different investment type or investing strategy to come to the fore."

Heres the link to the full article.

321gold.com