Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (752223)	10/23/2006 11:00:46 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

That is just too rich! BILLIONS stolen... and no one in authority seems to give a damn.

To: pompsander who wrote (752223)	10/23/2006 11:15:08 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

<Future> Reproduction revolution: Sex for fun, IVF for children * 20 October 2006 * Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition * Jo Whelan Could we be moving towards an age in which nature's genetic lottery is no longer seen as a desirable way to bring a child into the world? Might natural conception even come to be thought of as irresponsible? Reproducing the traditional way is undoubtedly flawed. Worldwide around 1 child in 16 is born with mental or physical disability due to a genetic defect. How much safer would it be to go along to a fertility clinic, have some embryos created and pick the one or two that will produce the healthiest baby? Until recently, IVF was only for those with fertility problems, but the rapid development of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis is starting to change this... newscientist.com