SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ManyMoose who wrote (13524)10/23/2006 12:30:57 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
more whacko goppers on the loose

"As a congressman, William Dannemeyer had a bit of reputation for being out there -- well now, he's out there for convicted killer Scott Peterson, saying the former Modesto fertilizer salesman was wrongly convicted of killing his wife, Laci.

"I believe a grave injustice has been done. An innocent man is in prison and condemned to die for a crime that he did not commit,'' Dannemeyer, a seven-term GOP congressman who left office in 1993, wrote in a Sept. 20 letter to state Attorney General Bill Lockyer.

Dannemeyer, 77, who lives in Fullerton down in Orange County, thinks Peterson was the victim of sensational journalism and a Modesto Police Department that zeroed in on him and ignored evidence that the killer may have belonged to a satanic cult.

Dannemeyer said his belief in Peterson's innocence is based on the book "Presumed Guilty'' by Matt Dalton, a onetime member of the Peterson defense team.

"This is all about justice and proof," Dannemeyer told us. "I believe there is a satanic cult operating in this state, and I think that law enforcement has a responsibility to investigate."

To spread the word, Dannemeyer sent copies of his letter to each of the state's 58 district attorneys and each of the state's 58 sheriffs via "restricted mail" at $8.50 a pop, which comes to $986.

"Sometimes,'' Dannemeyer said, "you have to just spend the money because it's the right thing to do."



To: ManyMoose who wrote (13524)10/23/2006 5:24:14 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
Cantwell represents her constituents, not you. You are arrogant to think she might put the interests of Washington State ahead of the interests of the democrat party.

<g>