Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (7557)	10/23/2006 1:01:05 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224718

Bush is the one who let Osama Bin Laden go and said on two occasions that he doesn't care about him anymore. If the RNC wants to try to use phony ads about demnocrats being eweak on Osama Bin Laden, the public will just wonder why Osama Bin LAden is still free five years after 9-11? And why Bush doesn't care. The fact is that 95% of the violence in Iraq is insurgencies which have nothing to do with Al Qaida. There is also no evidence Osama has a direct hand in anything going on there. Even Zarqawi was a separate player. He was not Al Qaida per se. He allied himself with them. Also, word is we got Zarqawi because AL Qaida tipped us off in exchange for going light in Afghanistan. If it's true that might explain a few things. Also, bottomline the whole country knows everything in Iraq is Bush's fault. It's his war and his only. He was the one who pulled the trigger without a plan and lied to the public so many times. He is the worst commander in chief we have ever had.