SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Buckey who wrote (96250)10/24/2006 11:16:11 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
SEC CANT STOP CHSD FROM TRADING AFTER THE 10 DAYS. CHSD WILL TRADE JUST LIKE HEYSEK FRAUDS CNDD AND AHFI. CNDD AND AHFI STILL TRADING TODAY siliconinvestor.com siliconinvestor.com

The shares of both companies were gyrating wildly for months before the SEC finally acted, in early December, to suspend the trading in one of the companies (Absolute Health and Fitness). In fact, the 10-day suspension only came after the press began questioning whether the company even existed.

Worse still, once the 10 days were up the shares were permitted to begin trading all over again, even though reporting in this column and elsewhere made clear that this so-called company had no assets, no employees, no revenues, no offices and no business address and was in fact nothing more than a hologram of a public company, conjured out of thin air by a fax and e-mail spamming campaign.

That’s right, folks, even as the SEC publicly accuses the only known officer or employee of Concorde America (one Hartley Lord of Boca Raton, Fla.) of running the business as a swindle machine out of his home office den, the stock itself continues to trade on the Over The Counter market, where 60,000 shares changed hands last Friday at prices ranging between nine and 10 cents a share.

Ditto for Absolute Health and Fitness Inc., which doesn't even have a den in Boca Raton to call home. Last week, more than 200,000 shares of this non-existent company crossed the Over The Counter tape at prices ranging between 30 cents and 60 cents per share - even though the shares themselves represent ownership of nothing at all.

If you ask the SEC why it allows things like this to happen, you'll hear endless whining excuses about how it doesn't have the resources, or the legal firepower, to stop them. But the one thing you won't hear is how it plans to go about getting the tools it needs to get the job done. Why bother with that when you can simply pretend to be proactive and "in control" - even as the white collar money riot that has consumed Wall Street for more than a decade continues to rage all around you?

Too Little, Too Late

By Christopher Byron
New York Post
March 14, 2005

It was great to learn from the current issue of Business Week that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has come up with a bold new plan to crack down on penny stock fraud.

And how encouraging it was to learn furthermore that this important new initiative has already led to action against two corporate evildoers: Concorde America Corp. of Boca Raton, Fla., and Absolute Health and Fitness Inc. of no certain abode anywhere.

But wait. Do those two companies ring the vaguest of bells? If so, maybe it's because we first peeked under the fraud-soaked petticoats of Concorde America for a column in this space seven entire months ago. And ditto for a look inside Absolute Health and Fitness Inc. four months after that.

And as for the news that the SEC will soon be tightening up its shell company registration rules, could it possibly be that the SEC has finally been roused to action on that particular matter by a column in this space five months ago that exposed billions of dollars in penny stock fraud occurring right under the noses of the regulators through loopholes in the very rules the SEC now belatedly intends to tighten?

In fact, what we have here isn't a bold new anything from the SEC, it's simply the latest effort at public-relations damage control from a bunch of Beltway bureaucrats who've missed the boat on virtually every major Wall Street swindle for the last 30 years.

It wasn't the SEC that uncovered Mike Milken's junk bond chicanery at Drexel Burnham & Co. two decades ago, it was a team of reporters from Forbes magazine. It wasn't the SEC that exposed Wall Street's next big mega-scandal - the Mafia's takeover of the penny stock market - 10 years after that, it was a reporter from the aforementioned Business Week.

Nor did the SEC blow the whistle on WorldCom or Enron or Tyco, or even worthless analysts like Henry Blodget or Jack Grubman. In just about every case you can name, the SEC got involved only belatedly - typically after reading what the press had uncovered first.

YOU'D think that a sense of shame would alone be enough to rouse the Commission to action. But PR posturing is about as far as the SEC ever gets, and with the SEC setting the pace, it's about all that law enforcement on Wall Street now amounts to anyway.

Consider that much hyped $1.4 billion settlement that New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer wrested from 10 of Wall Street's top brokerage firms two years ago for pushing bogus research on their customers during the bull market 1990s.

Most of that money will never reach the investors who were actually ripped off in the first place, but is already disappearing into nebulous and unnecessary PR pursuits like "research" and "education."

Officials involved in the settlement talks say that the brokerage firm defendants in the case strongly pushed for having as much of the money as possible earmarked for high-visibility PR gambits like "investor education" that would help transform them in the public's eye from swindlers and cheats into good corporate citizens. Think of that saucer of honey that you set out next to the blanket to keep the ants distracted when you have a picnic, and you've got the basic idea of what's really going on here.

Some $27.5 million of the settlement monies has thus now found its way into the coffers of an obscure Washington not-for-profit group known as the Investor Protection Trust. The Trust was founded by state regulators in an earlier fit of "investor education" more than a decade ago. The Trust accomplished nothing of note and promptly fell asleep for the next 10 years.

But the jingle of those settlement millions has now roused the Trust to action, and it has thus already budgeted $1.75 million of the loot to finance a 13-week series of half-hour "investor education" TV shows, which will begin airing on PBS next month.

Just as you might expect, the shows are really little more than slicked up infomercials for the stock market itself. Structured around a newsmagazine motif, they feature two co-hosts engaging in scripted and banal "anchor-chat" on topics like globalization, while carefully sidestepping any sense of the irony involved in the source of their funding: The penalties levied against the Street's most prestigious brokerage firms for stuffing worthless and misleading research down the throats of their own customers.

Back in real life, and with the ants suitably distracted by their little plates of honey, the feasting on Wall Street continues undisturbed. In the case of the SEC's action against the promoters behind the aforementioned Concorde America Inc. and Absolute Health and Fitness Inc., pee-arr says it all.

The shares of both companies were gyrating wildly for months before the SEC finally acted, in early December, to suspend the trading in one of the companies (Absolute Health and Fitness). In fact, the 10-day suspension only came after the press began questioning whether the company even existed.

Worse still, once the 10 days were up the shares were permitted to begin trading all over again, even though reporting in this column and elsewhere made clear that this so-called company had no assets, no employees, no revenues, no offices and no business address and was in fact nothing more than a hologram of a public company, conjured out of thin air by a fax and e-mail spamming campaign.

Many of the same group were behind the action in Concorde America Inc. as well - and trading in the shares of this outfit was never suspended by the SEC at all. Instead, by the time the SEC finally served court papers on seven of the principals in the two alleged swindles on Feb. 15, nearly $28 million had been stolen from the market by the ring in the fraudulent pumping and dumping of stock in the two companies.

So it's better than nothing, I suppose, that the SEC is now belatedly demanding that the $28 million be returned and that the defendants be made to promise to stop swindling in the future. But if everything the SEC is alleging is true (and I have no doubt that it is) then why are shares in these two fake companies continuing to trade, even as you read these words?

That’s right, folks, even as the SEC publicly accuses the only known officer or employee of Concorde America (one Hartley Lord of Boca Raton, Fla.) of running the business as a swindle machine out of his home office den, the stock itself continues to trade on the Over The Counter market, where 60,000 shares changed hands last Friday at prices ranging between nine and 10 cents a share.

Ditto for Absolute Health and Fitness Inc., which doesn't even have a den in Boca Raton to call home. Last week, more than 200,000 shares of this non-existent company crossed the Over The Counter tape at prices ranging between 30 cents and 60 cents per share - even though the shares themselves represent ownership of nothing at all.

If you ask the SEC why it allows things like this to happen, you'll hear endless whining excuses about how it doesn't have the resources, or the legal firepower, to stop them. But the one thing you won't hear is how it plans to go about getting the tools it needs to get the job done. Why bother with that when you can simply pretend to be proactive and "in control" - even as the white collar money riot that has consumed Wall Street for more than a decade continues to rage all around you?



To: Buckey who wrote (96250)10/24/2006 12:25:45 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
CSHD LOL 10/20 The Debi Kiontke Show. KOOKYNESS AT ITS BEST

streetiq.com



To: Buckey who wrote (96250)10/24/2006 1:18:46 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
Elgindy Co-Conspirator Cleveland Gets Probation

By Carol S. Remond
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
23 October 2006

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Stock trader Derrick Cleveland was sentenced to four year probation and $5,000 fine Monday for his role in a stock scheme to manipulate the price of penny stocks.

Cleveland was charged with others in May 2002 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York in a case involving the use of confidential government information to manipulate the stocks of small companies.

Cleveland, a convicted felon, quickly struck a deal, pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud, and cooperating with the government.

Cleveland testified at length during the trial of co-conspirator Anthony Elgindy and Jeffrey Royer, telling jurors how the two men and others conspired to use non-public information contained in Federal databases to depress the stocks of companies and even extort shares from them.

Elgindy was convicted in January 2005 of racketeering, conspiracy and securities fraud. He was recently sentenced to more than 11 years in prison and ordered to forfeit $1.5 million.

Royer, a former Federal Bureau of Investigation special agent, was also found guilty of racketeering conspiracy, securities fraud and obstruction of justice in the case. He was sentenced to six years in prison earlier this month.

-By Carol S. Remond, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-2074; carol.remond@dowjones.com [ 10-23-06 1628ET ]



To: Buckey who wrote (96250)10/24/2006 1:31:25 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
Mitchell Sepaniak -- Executive Vice President of Operations

Mr. Mitchell Sepaniak has over 25years of experience at the Executive management level with WebMD, ADP, National Data Corporation, Ciba, and Bausch & Lomb. Most recently he was the CEO of Weida Corporation.
cvsu.us

---------------------------------------------------------------
SEC Charges Securities Law Recidivist For Hedge Fund Fraud and Stock Manipulation

Litigation Release No. 19525 / January 10, 2006

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Anthony F. Giordano, Civil Action No. 06-60033 (Graham, J.; O’Sullivan, M.J.) (S.D. Florida, filed January 9, 2006)

SEC Charges Securities Law Recidivist For Hedge Fund Fraud and Stock Manipulation

On January 9, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed civil fraud charges in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Anthony F. Giordano for his role in two fraudulent schemes. Giordano is a securities law recidivist living in Boca Raton, Florida.

According to the SEC’s Complaint, the first scheme victimized several investors, including two nonprofit organizations, who lost millions of dollars in a purported hedge fund, EPG Limited Partners, Ltd. Giordano is allegedly responsible for numerous material misrepresentations and omissions to EPG investors concerning the use of their funds and EPG’s purported assets and returns. Giordano is also alleged to have diverted substantial amounts of investor funds for undisclosed purposes, including approximately $1.5 million for personal use. The second scheme charged in the Complaint involved market manipulation of the common stock of WEIDA Communications, Inc., a publicly-traded company. Giordano is alleged to have manipulated the market price for WEIDA common stock to approximately $5 per share, in part to facilitate the sale of WEIDA stock in private transactions at approximately $3 per share. Hundreds of investors, many elderly and unsophisticated, allegedly paid millions of dollars for WEIDA common stock at these inflated prices. Giordano is alleged to have received approximately $1.5 million of investor funds from these transactions. The SEC suspended trading in WEIDA securities on April 25, 2005 (34 Act Rel. No. 51603).

Without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint, Giordano consented to a final judgment permanently enjoining him from violations of Sections 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, imposing permanent officer and director and penny stock bars, and directing that he pay disgorgement of $3.25 million but providing that payment of that amount is deemed satisfied upon entry of an order requiring Giordano to pay at least that much in restitution in a related criminal case, United States of America v. Anthony F. Giordano, et al., Case No. 05-80061-CR (S.D. Fla. Original Indictment Filed April 14, 2005). Giordano also pleaded guilty to related criminal charges.

The SEC acknowledges the assistance of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Florida Office of Financial Regulation. The SEC’s investigation is continuing.

SEC Complaint in this matter

sec.gov

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
RELEASE NO. 51603 / APRIL 25, 2005
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant
to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), of over-thecounter
trading of the securities of Weida Communications, Inc. (symbol “WDAC”) of
Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The suspension will commence at 9:30 a.m. EDT, April 25,
2005, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on May 6, 2005.
The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of Weida
Communications, Inc. because of concerns regarding potentially manipulative
transactions in Weida’s common stock by certain individuals associated with the
company and others.
The Commission cautions brokers, dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that
they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently
available information and any information subsequently issued by Weida
Communications, Inc.
Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11
under the Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may
be entered unless and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the
rule. If any broker or dealer has any questions as to whether or not he has complied with
the rule, he should not enter any quotation but immediately contact the staff of the
Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. If any broker or dealer is
uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, he should refrain from entering
quotations relating to the securities of Weida Communications, Inc. until such time as he
has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been
met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation for the stock of Weida
Communications, Inc. that is in violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the
need for prompt enforcement action.
If any broker-dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter,
they should communicate it immediately to Lucee Kirka, Senior Counsel, Division of
Enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission. She can be reached at (202)
824-5559, or by e-mail at KirkaL@SEC.GOV.