SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (307564)10/24/2006 9:22:52 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573830
 
"Now you tell me. Hidden agenda?"

I dunno. You did a fair amount of cherry picking to come up with your examples. There were a lot more, and they don't seem at all obscure.

Lke this one.

Motion To Table Stabenow AMDT. No. 1823; Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Iraq and Afghanistan Security and Reconstruction Act, 2004
On the Motion to Table
10/14/2003 -- Reid (for Stabenow) Amendment No. 1823, to provide emergency relief for veterans healthcare, school construction, healthcare and transportation needs in the United States, and to create 95,000 new jobs. (By 59 yeas to 35 nays (Vote No. 379), Senate tabled the amendment.)
Bill Number: S.1689

Or this one

Motion To Table Reed Amdt. No. 1834; Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for Iraq and Afghanistan Security and Reconstruction Act, 2004
On the Motion to Table
10/15/2003 -- Reed/Hagel Amendment No. 1834, to increase the end strength of the Army and to structure the additional forces for constabulary duty. (By 45 yeas to 52 nays (Vote No. 382), Senate failed to table the amendment.)
Bill Number: S.1689

Clearly, you have made up your mind that they are secretly funded by Soros, so...



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (307564)10/25/2006 5:31:36 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573830
 
Most of the Congressional votes that IAVA took a position on seem to be obscure, but here's one that the IAVA opposed, but passed anyway:

Sounds like a good amendment, no? Then I took a look at who voted for it and against it. Lo and behold, the only states that voted against it were "blue states," including NY, Mass, and CA.

No Dem got an A+. I think the best score was an A- That would suggest that the Dems did not vote IAVA's way every time.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News