SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (307825)10/26/2006 9:21:02 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571927
 
Was Roosevelt anti-military? I'll remind you that he was singularly focused on getting a recalcitrant American populace to wake up to the dangers of Hitler. Thank God, he was able to do that with a little help from Pearl Harbor. BTW, he was a Democrat. Clinton cut the military greatly, it's true. But he didn't hesitate to take us to war in Kosovo using our massive airforce. Successfully, I might add.

As far as Al Gore, I didn't see your post saying he was anti-nuke facilities. I think that's a mistake. If we move to electric cars for instance, we're going to need alot of clean electricity. Nukes provide that.



To: steve harris who wrote (307825)10/27/2006 7:10:27 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571927
 
Are you changing the subject? You said democrats were not anti-military yet their track record shows they are. You;re being "DOOPed" by their rhetoric. "Democrats out of power".

So you think its good to be pro military, pro war, pro killing? For the Dems, the military is a necessary evil. If you really understood the complexity behind that concept, you would agree too.