Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (3612)	10/27/2006 4:59:16 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

Nonsense.... He posts no substance...period. I post plenty of substance...just not to BDS afflicted meatheads like you and AS. LOL

To: JBTFD who wrote (3612)	10/27/2006 5:03:04 PM
From: mistermj	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10087

Analysis doesn't support your viewpoint by a factor of 2.23 AS >>>>>>>>Ignored By 268 ----------------------------- jlallen >>>>>>Ignored by 120 = 2.23 people to 1 think AS has less substance than jlallen. ;-)

To: JBTFD who wrote (3612)	10/27/2006 10:24:23 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

It's interesting to see the partisanship displayed even with the new recommendation feature .. (just like with peoplemarks) Here is an obvious example from the Canucky thread Message 22872241 Even more blatant since so many folks find ralph annoying so that is IMO the real catalyst Message 22935922 yet here is an example I'd say of a post that merits recos as it is thought provoking despite not agreeing with all points.. Message 22940902 A few years ago during an ongoing disagreement with another poster I came up with this formula for fun with numbers :o) To: Chispas (who wrote) 6/8/2006 1:35:28 AM From: Aladdin Sane I made up a little formula once called the $hit QUOTIENT for my own amusement... ln ((Ignores / Peoplemarks) x posts)) ^ (1 + bans) ln is natural log ^ is exponential symbol... eg I am: {ln ( 9 / 64 ) x 12281)} raised to the power of 1 for a QUOTIENT of 7.45, you get 8.45 and (name removed) gets 96.74... lower is better LOL.... all in fun... Al (ex Kastel) Al ooops quick edit on name removed there!!