SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Tara Gold Resources Corp. (TRGD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: clclcl who wrote (8)10/28/2006 10:02:10 AM
From: creede  Respond to of 256
 
Had not seen that. Thanks because I was looking for a good explanation of Tara Gold. I think the main reason this one is so cheap is because of a lack of understanding. That article should help.

silverinscripture.com

Please Note:
The name of American Stellar Energy has changed to Tara Gold as anticipated.
The new stock ticker symbol is TRGD.PK



Excellent TA Charts
by Roy Martens
Daily and Weekly Analysis of AMRS


A 'Stellar' Opportunity

If any of you aren't already aware of the recent nosebleed rise in price of Paramount Gold's stock, I suggest you take a look (PGDP.PK 6-month Chart). I myself was unaware of Paramount Gold until mid-December of this past year, when I was fortunate enough to acquire a position at $.86/share. Paramount Gold now trades at $3.58/share just a few weeks later (closing 1/18/06). Now don't misunderstand me, I'm not promoting Paramount Gold, this report is about the little known American Stellar Energy (AMRS.PK). I've since sold my position in Paramount Gold to lock in gains, and I've reinvested a portion of that money into AMRS.

One thing to recognize is that Paramount has the ability to raise substantial amounts of money in short order, as evidenced by their two recent above-market financings, which together raised $1 million. This is extremely good news for their JV partners, and AMRS is partnered with them in 2 of its 4 properties.

AMRS currently trades at $0.099/share (closing 1/18/06), and has about 62 million outstanding shares. This equates to the very modest market capitalization of $6.14 million. Contrast this to Paramount Gold's over 30 million outstanding shares at $3.58, making for a market capitalization of $107.4 million.

The First Property in which American Stellar Energy is Joint-Ventured with Paramount Gold is the San Miguel Groupings:

The San Miguel District is made up of several concessions and past producing mines known individually as San Miguel (the head of the group), Santa Clara, La Blanca, San Luis, El Carmen, Swanick, Sangre, Sangre De Cristo, Guadalupe De los Reyes, San Juan, El Rosario, Empalme, Las Tres S.S.S., and Las Tres B.B.B.

The JV agreement will allow Paramount Gold to acquire a 70% interest in the property, AMRS retaining their 30%. Paramount currently has the rights to 25% of the property. In order to exercise their full rights, Paramount must:

Pay AMRS a total of $400,000 ($300,000 paid thus far) to acquire 35% interest.

Issue to AMRS a total of 700,000 shares of their stock. (300,000 are being issued to AMRS at this time)

Spend a total of $3.5 million on exploration work, plus other payments.

Pay AMRS $50,000 or an equivalent value of its shares annually.

Paramount is planning to commence an extensive drill program on the San Miguel property in February of 2006.

The Second Property in which American Stellar Energy is Joint-Ventured with Paramount Gold is La Blanca (adjacent to San Miguel):

At La Blanca, previous drilling indicates a block of over 6 million tonnes, grading 4.7 ounces silver per ton, and .013 ounces gold per ton. That's over 28.2 million ounces silver and 78,000 ounces gold, of which bench mark metallurgical testing shows that recoveries of 90% are possible using flotation (a relatively cheap and easy way to extract the gold and silver).

With 90% recovery, that's 25.4 million ounces of silver and over 70,000 ounces gold.

Bill Reed, Paramount's exploration officer, stated that “We are planning an extensive drill program that I believe will not only validate this resource, but add significantly to it.”

In fact, it has been concluded by Paramount Gold that tonnage can be increased 2-3 times by exploring below the current level of penetration.

Bill Reed was the former Chief Geologist (1998-2004) for the Mexican subsidiary of Hecla Mining.

Paramount is planning to commence an extensive drill program on La Blanca in February of 2006.

This agreement allows Paramount to acquire a 70% interest, AMRS retaining their 30%. In order to fully exercise their rights, Paramount must:

Pay an initial $50,000 to the property owner (done).

Pay the property owner an additional $960,000 within a 10-month period commencing January 31, 2006.

Make 80% of all future property payments.

If Paramount chooses to exercise its full 70% interest in both properties before year-end 2006 (which seems very likely), then the total compensation to AMRS would be:

700,000 shares of PGDP, currently (closing 1/18/06) valued at $2.51 million US.

$50,000 US yearly.

80% of all future property payments on La Blanca.

A virtual free ride on exploring the historically prolific San Miguel Groupings as Paramount will be spending $2.5 million on exploratory costs.

The 700,000 Paramount shares alone represent over 40% of AMRS's current market capitalization! That's pure profit which could be realized in less than 1 year from now!

There is a hold time of 1 year on the 700,000 shares. As to what might be done after this period, I can think of two options:

Sell them to fund operations

Distribute them to shareholders of AMRS as a dividend.

American Stellar Energy also owns 2 other properties:

La Currita:

Active mine, with a 150 ton/day mill.

Currently generating revenue of about $110,000/month.

With the proposed plans to upgrade the mill and ramp up production to full capacity (currently running at about one-half), La Currita operations should easily cover all company expenses in the future and still show a profit.*

*AMRS has very moderate overhead costs with a high percentage of all money going into the ground.

La Millionaire:

Looking for a strong Joint Venture Partner.

Outcrop portion of vein estimated at 1.8 million tonnes, grading at 8g/tonne gold.

Mine tailings remaining from a previous small mining operation are estimated to be 29,000 tonnes at 9.6g/ton gold.

Combined, the above numbers indicate that there remains at least 472,000 ounces gold yet to be exploited, with a fraction of the property being explored to date.

It's only been a little over 7 months since Francis R. Biscan, Jr., President of American Stellar Resources, visited Mexico and acquired the four aforementioned properties in May of 2005. With 2 joint ventures already completed, and the continuing operation of the La Currita mine (it was already producing when acquired), this represents some fast and impressive work. And it appears we can expect more of the same in the future.

Look for a name change in the near future. The probable change will turn what is now American Stellar Energy to Tara Gold Mining Corp. This change alone will bring much more exposure to the company as it clarifies the company's position and objective. The “Energy” in American Stellar Energy used to stand for the oil and natural gas properties* that the company once owned, but they have since been sold in order to focus on the mining of silver and gold in Mexico.

*Currently, management has no plans to become involved again in oil and natural gas properties.

Francis Biscan has a number of contacts in Mexico, and this allows him to scope out attractive properties and bring them to the table for Paramount and others to consider. Thus, the plan of the American Stellar is simple: discover promising mining opportunities, work out a JV with a partner, and begin realizing significant cash-flow once the properties are brought into production or bought-out. Thus, when all is said and done, AMRS will be able to reap significant profits while spending very little capital.

It's simply amazing that Paramount is valued almost 18 times more highly than American Stellar, when their JV arrangements call for a 70/30-split interest. Furthermore, American Stellar Energy has two additional properties (100% owned), including a producing mine, as well as one other property that is in the works.

In contrast, Paramount Gold has one other property, the Linda Property in Peru, within which they can only become 51% operator according to the terms of the JV arrangement between Minera ABX Exploraciones (a subsidiary of Barrick Gold) and themselves. Besides, this Peruvian property seems to be in an early stage of development, and it also appears that the majority of Paramount's value lies in it's two Mexican properties, within which they are joint-ventured with American Stellar Energy.


GB-ND
creede



To: clclcl who wrote (8)10/28/2006 11:32:07 AM
From: creede  Respond to of 256
 
This story just keeps getting better.

By: gold1690
05 Oct 2006, 06:04 PM EDT
Msg. 7013 of 7105
Jump to msg. #
Deloitte
I saw a post on I H saying that Rich has hired Deloitte to bring the filings up to date.

I was so impressed, I called Rich to make sure that was accurate. Indeed it is and they are the second largest CPA firm in the world. Not the folks you're going to hire if you have anything to hide. Our CEO is hopeful that the accounting will be finished by year end. I don't know how long it will take after that for filings and move to BB.

I bought this stock on Jan 21, 2004 and I'll tell ya 510,000 shares will change your life - and the best is yet to come. Rich is bubbling over with enthusiasm over events unfolding.. Be patient, I think we'll see $1.00 before Xmas.

en.wikipedia.org

gold


GB-ND
c



To: clclcl who wrote (8)10/28/2006 4:22:03 PM
From: creede  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 256
 
More stuff from Bobwins.

Posted by: Bobwins
In reply to: wrongjoe who wrote msg# 2351 Date:10/28/2006 1:54:02 PM
Post #of 2353

wrongjoe. There are a couple ways for you to investigate Tara. First, let's look at the negatives.

1. Pink sheet status so no reporting of financials or SEC reporting. This is supposed to be fixed by yearend. Mexican subsidiary is the problem. They bought it and it's the source of their deals but the financials have been tough to get a CPA to sign off on. Deloitte Touche unit in Mexico is supposedly working to get it ready for audit by a US firm named in a recent PR.
2. Why does Tara claim to be able to find properties that others can't? How can they do this with little cash and no mining professionals or geologists on staff?

These are weaknesses that I admit are hard to get around.

However, let's look at the positives.

1. Their deals are ALL with reporting companies.
Raven, rvgc.ob
Paramount, Pdgp.ob
Columbia Metals, Col.v
Lateegra, Lgr.v

If Tara was a scam, would these reporting companies do business with them? Wouldn't they check out the properties with geologists and check Tara's title claims?

In fact Paramount, Columbia and Lateegra have gone to the public markets to raise money to explore Tara jt venture properties after making the deals. Can all four of these listed companies be wrong? I presume they have kicked the dirt and examined the title to these mining properties.

The total value of the stock held by Tara of their jt venture partners is currently $4,920,247.50. I publish their listed value each week.

The other valuable fact is that these public companies will report on their mining progress on the Tara properties and even if Tara isn't immediately listed otc, we will have a window into the progress of the projects thru their partners. We know the percentages of each project that Tara holds and can extrapolate any financial results from that.

2. Three of the jt venture projects were closed mining operations with existing infrastructure and equipment. That has been the model, find properties with near term production ability to generate cashflow.

We will be able to tell very soon if Tara's partners restart the mines and produce revenues. Two of them reported last week that they are moving toward production with low cost heap leach mining operations. One already has ore loaded on the pile and is getting ready to retreive gold that has been sitting there for many years after the mine shutdown.

3. The story jibes with history. These mines closed due to low gold/silver prices. We know that is true. There is history on several of the properties that can be verified.

4. CEO Rich Biscan has demonstrated that he doesn't want to dilute. These deals with public companies are done. Not PR'd to be coming but DONE! No dilution, cash to Tara, increasing retained percentages for Tara as each deal is done because Tara is in a better bargaining position. Each deal adds a small amount of current cashflow and shares of partner's stock and future cashflow to Tara's side of the ledger. Because Tara has a minimal staff and won't be operating the mines, the small cashflow is sufficient to maintain operations without issuing shares like most junior exploration companies.

5. Public PR's from Tara's partners have pretty much verificed what Tara stated about the projects in their original Jt Venture announcements. If these were bogus projects, there would be cancelled projects.

6. Tara has demonstrated they have connections. There are plenty of junior exploration companies in Canada and the US looking for projects. The sector is hot. Tara has what they want. Verified projects that can be moved towards production quickly so they can strike while the iron is hot.

7. As Tara moves into 2007, their cashflow should jump dramatically as La Currita, Lluvia and Picachio move into production. This new cashflow will change Tara's options. They will have cash to do their own projects or keep a much bigger percentage of their projects.

I have spoken with Biscan and find him straight forward. He is not your normal excited precious metals pumper who teases you with little hints about future BIG projects. What he told me has basically happened EXCEPT for the financials and the otc listing. So that's the big hurdle remaining.

The first three projects are not going to set the world on fire. They are small 15-30,000 oz per year mines that will generate positive cashflow at today's prices for these small startup companies. Tara has such small overhead that they will provide a nice cashflow for them.

San Miguel could be a genuinely big project. Paramount has spent a lot of time and money to drill it out and keeps extending the ore zones. They have secured additional surrounding property beyond what Tara sold them, which indicates they are happy with what they have found so far.

Las Minitas could be a large silver project with over 100 million oz of silver.

Biscan is excited about the base metal project and you notice there was not followup jt venture announcement. That has been his previous pattern. He announces Tara has obtained a new project and then immediately announces a jt venture. I think this means that he intends to keep all or most of the base metal project.

Do your DD. I have over 100 stock positions but a concentration of about 30% in gold/silver and Tara is my second biggest gold/silver position. I have bigger positions in established miners like GG, Hbm.to, EZM and decent exposure to AUY but think Tara could be a big winner down the road. My average cost is .31 so I'm already happy. Bobwins

If the Commodities Boom is Over, I am just a Gold Bug headed for the Windshield of LIFE

GB-ND
c